Degrowth carries the idea of a voluntary reduction of the size of the economic system, which implies a reduction of the GDP.
However degrowth is not simply about challenging the centrality of GDP as the overarching policy objective but proposes a framework for transformation to a lower and sustainable level and mode of production and consumption.
Degrowth is about finding a path or a transition to social justice, well being and ecological sustainability. It involves a range of actions at the individual and collective level based on a change of values and democratization of societies.
Degrowth is about people rather than technology deciding on the direction of societal evolution. It is also about giving meaning to human life which is not per se associated with conspicuous consumption and materialism.
Below we have pasted part of a document elaborated by Joan Martinez-Alier.
The content is extracted from a previous work elaborated by Martinez-Alier, Hali Healy, Leah Temper, Mariana Walter from ICTA, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. AAAS, San Diego, California, 19-23 February 2010, session 1347
BEYOND GDP LIES ECONOMIC DEGROWTH
The expression, Beyond GDP, is in fashion in Brussels among some European civil servants and politicians, 40 years after Commission President Sicco Mansholt had already criticized GDP, and had proposed an end to economic growth in rich countries. The slogan in Brussels is “the greening of the economy: beyond GDP”.
But there is no official acceptance of “Economic Degrowth leading to a Steady-State Economy” if not (yet) as a plausible political programme at least as an interesting field for research.
GDP growth goes together with increasing pressure on biodiversity, climate change, and the destruction of human livelihoods at the “commodity frontiers”. Environmental activists are comforted by the academic critiques of GDP. Actually, feminist activists and academics (Waring, 1988) made a convicing argument a long time ago against GDP
accounting because it “forgot” not only to count nature’s services but also unpaid domestic work. Moreover, another type of critique against GDP accounting is now surfacing socially, the so-called Easterlin Paradox as updated by work by social psychologists (with Nobel Prizes in economics). It seems that increases in happiness do not correlate with increases in income above a certain level of per capita income (e.g. 10,000€ per year). Such criticisms against GDP accounting go much beyond the introduction of complementary measurements of social performance such as the HDI (human development index) that correlates closely across countries with GDP per capita. They also go beyond the idea of simply “greening the GDP”, or introducing satellite accounts (in physical or money figures).
Among the physical indices of sustainability, the best known is the Ecological Footprint (EF) that made its debut in 1992 at an Ecological Economics conference (Rees and Wackernagel, 1994). It has been successful with conservationist organizations, the WWF publishes its results regularly. The EF translates into a single number in hectares
the use per capita of land for food, fibre, wood, plus the build environment (paved space for houses and roads), plus the hypothetical land that would be used to absorb the carbon dioxide produced by burning fossil fuels. For rich industrial economies, the total comes to 4 or more hectares per capita, of which more than half is the hypothetical carbon dioxide absorption land.
Going beyond GDP accounting in Europe should mean something different from “greening the GDP” or that, at the other extreme, genuflecting before one single environmental index such as the EF. It should mean to go into a multicriteria assessment of the economy, working with eight, ten, twelve indicators of social, cultural, economic and environmental performance (Shmelev and Rodriguez-Labajos, 2009). Perhaps all the indicators improve together in some period of history or, more likely, some improve while some deteriorate. For instance, the economic crisis of 2008-09 implies in Spain a very substantial decrease in emissions of carbon dioxide, less accidents at the work place, less would-be immigrants drowning at sea, and a sudden slowing down in the rate of soil sealing, while it also means much increased unemployment and perhaps an increase in some forms of crime. Are we better off now than in 2007? Or rather, previous to this, could be agree on a methodology for macroeconomic participatory multi-criteria evaluation with a set of socially agreed indicators?
“Beyond GDP” should mean to go beyond the single imperative of economic growth in the rich countries. The décroissance movement in France, the decrescita movement in Italy, have one of their roots in ecological economics, namely in Georgescu-Roegen’s work. Some articles of his were translated and published thirty years ago (by Grinevald and Rens, 1979) with the title Démain la décroissance with which he explicitly agreed. This seems to have been the first time that “economic degrowth” was put forward as a slogan. The bulk of French and Italian activists in the décroissance and decrescita movements have perhaps read a few articles by Georgescu-Roegen but not his books on energy, materials and the economy (1966 - introduction, and 1971). They are not available in French or Italian, and they are anyway hard to digest. Nevetheless, this does not stop them, as activists, from singing the praises of Georgescu-Roegen. Nothing to criticize in all this - painful to scholars but in the nature of social movements.
The Degrowth activists in France and Italy are keen on one concept of industrial ecology: the Jevons’ paradox or “rebound effect” (Polimeni et al, 2009). They have read economic anthropologists such as Serge Latouche (2007), they are inspired by environmental thinkers of the 1970s such as André Gorz and Ivan Illich. But Degrowth is not based on iconic writings. It is a social movement born from experiences of co-housing, squatting, neo-ruralism, reclaiming the streets, alternative energies, waste prevention and recycling. It is a new slogan, a new movement, and very soon now a new research programme. This is a case of activist-led science, towards a new branch in the sustainability social sciences that could be called “economic degrowth studies” closely related to academic “socio-ecological transition studies” (Fischer-Kowalski and Haberl, eds., 2007, Haberl et al, 2009, Krausmann et al, 2008, Krausmann et al, 2009).
There is no similar Degrowth movement (yet?) in Germany, the U.K., the United States, and Japan but the convergence of Degrowth activists with ecological economists and industrial ecologists has produced already two scholarly conferences in Europe (Paris, April 2008, Barcelona, March 2010). The words “economic degrowth” have successfully been introduced into academic journals. A variety of topics in the degrowth research programme are listed in the call for papers for the Barcelona conference, while a collection of papers from the first conference (edited by Schneider, Kallis and Martinez-Alier, 2010) has been published in an academic publication, the Journal of Cleaner Production (a journal of industrial ecology) including a remarkable article by Christian Kerschner explaining Georgescu-Roegen’s criticism of Daly’s “steady-state economy” (Daly, 1973, 1991, 2007). Kerschner looks at “degrowth” as a stage towards a steady-state economy. An excellent book with papers from the Paris 2008 Degrowth conference has been published in French (Mylondo, 2009).
Perhaps DG Research of the EC will soon make a call for research proposals under the description, “Beyond GDP: Socially Sustainable Economic Degrowth. Environmental, social, technological, financial, socio-psychological and demographic aspects of economic degrowth leading to a steady-state economy in Europe and other rich economies”. Once again, activist-led science.
Binimelis, R., Pengue, W., Monterroso, I. 2009. “Transgenic treadmill”: responses to the emergence and spread of the Glyphosate-resistant Johnsongrass in Argentina, Geoforum 40(4): 623-633.
Boulding, K., 1966. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth, in Environmental quality in a growing economy (H. Jarret et al., eds.), John Hopkins Press, Baltimore.
Bunker, S. 1984. Modes of extraction, unequal exchange, and the progressive underdevelopment of an extreme periphery. The Brazilian Amazon. American Journal of Sociology, 89: 1017-1064.
Bunker, S. 1985. Underdeveloping the Amazon: Extraction, unequal exchange, and the failure of the modern state. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Bunker, S. 2007. The Poverty of Resource Extraction. In Rethinking environmental history: world-system history and global environmental change, edited by A. Hornborg, et al. Altamira Press, Lanham
Clapp, J., Utting, P. (eds.). 2009. Corporate accountability and sustainable development, Oxford U.P., Delhi.
Cornut, P., Bauler, T., Zaccaï, E. (eds.). 2007. Environnement et inégalités sociales, Brussels, Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 214 p.
Costanza, R. (ed.). 1991, Ecological Economics: the Science and Management of Sustainability, Columbia U.P. New York.
Costanza, R., Segura, O., Martinez-Alier, J., (eds.). 1996. Getting down to earth: practical applications of ecological economics, Island Press, Washington DC, 494 p.
Daly, H. 1968. On economics as a life science, Journal of Political Economy, 76 (3) (May – Jun): 392-406.
Daly, H. 1973. Toward a Steady-state Economy. WH Freeman & Co, San Francisco, 332 p.
Daly, H. 1991. Steady-State Economics: Second Edition with New Essays, Island Press, Washington, DC.
Daly, H. 2007. Ecological economics and sustainable development, selected essays, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Escobar, A. 2008. Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes, Duke UP, Durham, 456 p.
European Environment Agency (EAA). 2002. Late Lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000. Environmental Issues Report No. 22, 210 p.
Fischer-Kowalski, F., Haberl, H. (eds.) 2007. Socioecological transitions and global change. Trajectories of social metabolism and land use, preface by J. Martinez-Alier, E. Elgar, Cheltenham, 263 p.
Funtowicz S. O., Ravetz J. R. 1994. The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecological Economics, 10: 197-207.
Georgescu-Roegen. N. 1966. Analytical Economics, Harvard U.P., Cambridge.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. 1971. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard U.P., Cambridge.
Gerber, J.F., Veuthey, S., Martinez-Alier, J. 2009. Linking political ecology with ecological economics in tree plantation conflicts in Cameroon and Ecuador. Ecological Economics, 68(12): 2885-89.
Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., 2009. The biofuel delusion. Earthscan. London.
Giljum, S., Eisenmenger, N. 2004. International trade and the distribution of environmental goods and burdens: a biophysical perspective. Journal of Environmentand Development, 13(1): 73-100.
Goeminne, G., Paredis, E. 2009. The concept of ecological debt: challenging established science-policy frameworks in the transition to sustainable development. In: Techera, E. (ed.), Frontiers of environment and citizenship. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press (in press).
Goemmine, G., Paredis, E. 2009. The concept of ecological debt: some steps towards an enriched sustainability paradigm, Environment, Development and Sustainability (in press).
Gonzalez, A.C., Schandl, H. 2008. The biophysical perspective of a middle income economy: Material flows in Mexico. Ecological Economics, 68 (1-2): 317-327.
Grinevald, J., Rens, I. eds, 1995. <st1:personname productid="La D￩croissance" w:st="on">La Décroissance</st1:personname> : Entropie, écologie, économie, Sang de <st1:personname productid="la Terre" w:st="on">la Terre</st1:personname>, Paris (a selection of writings by N. Georgescu-Roegen, first published in 1979).
Guha, R., Martinez-Alier, J. 1997. Varieties of Environmentalism. Essays North and South. Earthscan, London, 246 p.
Haberl, H., Erb, K.H., Krausmann, F., Berecz, S., Ludwiczek, N., Martinez-Alier, J., Musel, A., Schaffartzik, A. 2009. Using embodied HANPP to analyze teleconnections in the global land system: conceptual considerations, Danish Journal of Geography, 109(2): 119-130.
Haberl, H, Fischer-Kowalski, M, Krausmann, F., Martinez-Alier, J., Winiwater, V. <st1:metricconverter productid="2009. A" w:st="on">2009. A</st1:metricconverter> socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another Great Transformation, Sustainable Development, in press.
Hall, C., Cleveland, C., Kauffman, R.1986. Energy and Resources Use. The Ecology of the Economic Process. Wiley, New York.
Hornborg, A. 1998. Toward an ecological theory of unequal exchange: articulating world system theory and ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 25(1): 127-136.
Hornborg, A. 2009. Zero-Sum World: Challenges in Conceptualizing Environmental Load Displacement and Ecologically Unequal Exchange in the World System, International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 50 (3-4): 237-262.
Hornborg, A., Jorgensen, A.K. (eds). 2010. International Trade and Environmental Justice: Toward a Global Political Ecology. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science. Forthcoming.
Hornborg, A., McNeill, J, Martinez-Alier, J. (eds). 2007. Rethinking environmental history: World-system history and global environmental change, Altamira Press, Lanham, 420 p.
Jorgenson, A. 2009. The Sociology of Unequal Exchange in Ecological Context: A Panel Study of Lower-Income Countries, 1975-2000. Sociological Forum, 24(1): 22-46.
Kallis, G., Martinez-Alier, J., Norgaard, R. 2009. Paper assets, real debts. An ecological economic exploration of the global economic crisis. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 5 (1/2): 14-25.
Kneese, A., Ayres, R.U. 1969. Production, Consumption and Externalities, American Economic Review, 59: 282-297.
Krausmann, F., M. Fischer-Kowalski, H. Schandl and N. Eisenmenger. 2008. The global socio-metabolic transition: past and present metabolic profiles and their future trajectories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(5-6): 637-657.
Krausmann, F., S. Gingrich, N. Eisenmenger, K.H. Erb, H. Haberl and M. Fischer-Kowalski. 2009. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics 68(10):2696–2705.
Latouche, S., 2007, Le Pari de <st1:personname productid="La D￩croissance" w:st="on">la Décroissance</st1:personname>, Fayard, Paris.
Martinez-Alier, J. 1987. Ecological Economics. Energy, Environment and Society. Blackwell, Oxford.
Martinez-Alier, J., Temper, L. 2007. Oil and Climate Change: Voices from the South, Economic and Political Weekly, 15 Dec. 2007.
Martinez-Alier, J. 2002. The environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 328 p. (Oxford University Press, Delhi, New introduction 2005, 312 p.).
Martinez-Alier, J. 2009. Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Languages of Valuation. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 20 (1): 58-87.
Martinez-Alier, J., Ropke, I. eds. 2008. Recent Developments in Ecological Economics, 2 vols, E.Elgar, Cheltenham.
Muñoz, P., Giljum, S., Roca, J. 2009. The Raw Material Equivalents of InternationalTrade. Empirical Evidence for Latin America. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(6): 881-897.
Muradian, R., Martinez-Alier, J. 2001. Trade and the environment from a “Southern” perspective, Ecological Economics, 36: 281-297.
Muradian, R., O’Connor, M., Martinez-Alier, J. 2002. Embodied pollution in trade: estimating the environmental load displacement of industrializad countries, Ecological Economics, 41: 51-67.
Mylondo, B, ed. 2009. La décroissance économique. Pour la soutenabilité écologique et l’équite sociale. Edtions du Croquant, Broissieux.
Odum, H.T., 1971, Environment, Power and Society, Wiley, New York.
Orta, M., Napolitano, D.A., MacLennan, G.J., O'Callaghan, C., Ciborowski, S., Fabregas, X. 2008. Impacts of petroleum activities for the Achuar people of the Peruvian Amazon: summary of existing evidence and research gaps, Environmental Research Letters, 2(4), 045006, 10 p.
Paredis, E., Goeminne, G., Vanhove, W., Maes, F., Lambrecht, J. 2008. The concept of ecological debt: its meaning and applicability in international policy, Academia Press, Gent, 228 p.
Pengue, W. 2005. Transgenic Crops in Argentina: The Ecological and Social Debt. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(4): 314-322 .
Peralta, A.K. ed., 2009, Ecological Debt: the peoples of the South are the creditors. Cases from Ecuador, Mozambique, Brazil and India. World Council of Curches, Geneva.
Pereira, Â. G., Funtowicz, S. 2009. Science for policy : new challenges, new opportunities, Oxford University Press, Delhi; Oxford, 360 p.
Perez Rincon, M.A. 2006. Colombian international trade from a physical perspective: Towards an ecological Prebisch thesis, Ecological Economics, 59: 519-529.
Perez Rincon, M.A. 2007. Comercio internacional y medio ambiente en Colombia. Una mirada desde la economía ecológica. Programa Editorial Universidad del Valle, Cali, 385 p.
Pimentel, D. et al. 1973. Food production and the energy crisis, Science, 182: 443-449.
Polimeni, J., Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M., Alcott, B. 2007. The Jevons’ Paradox and the myth of resource efficiency improvements, Earthscan, London.
Rappaport, R. 1967. Pigs for the ancestors. Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people, Yale U.P., New Haven.
Rees, W., Wackernagel, M., 1994. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity, in A.M. Jansson et al, Investing in natural capital: the ecological economics approach to sustainability, Island Press, Washington D.C.
Rice, J. 2007. Ecological unequal exchange: international trade and uneven utilization of environmental space in the world system. Social Forces, 85 (3): 1369-1392.
Roberts, J. T., Parks, B.C. 2007. Fueling Injustice: Globalization, Ecologically Unequal Exchange and Climate Change. Globalizations, 4(2): 193-210.
Robleto, M. L., Marcelo, W. 1992. Deuda Ecológica. Instituto de Ecologia Política, Santiago, Chile.
Ropke, I., 2004. The early history of modern ecological economics, Ecological Economics, 50(3-4): 293-314
Russi, D., Gonzalez, A.C., Silva-Macher, J.C., Giljum, S., Martinez-Alier, J., Vallejo, M.C.. 2008. Material Flows in Latin America: A Comparative Analysis of Chile, Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru, 1980-2000. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(5-6): 704-720.
Russi, D. 2008. An integrated assessment of large-scale biodiesel production in Italy: Killing several birds with one stone?, Energy Policy 36: 1169-1180
Schneider, F., Kallis, G. Martinez-Alier, J. 2010. Introduction to the special issue on Socially Sustainable Economic Degrowth. Journal of Cleaner Production. Forthcoming.
Shmelev S., Rodriguez-Labajos B. 2009. Dynamic multi-dimensional assessment of sustainability at the macro level: the case of Austria, Ecological Economics, 68: 2560-73.
Simms, A. 2005. Ecological debt. The health of the planet and the wealth of nations. Pluto Press, Ann Arbor, London, 224 p.
Srinivasan, U.T., Carey, S.P., Hallsteind, E., Higgins, P.A.T., Kerr, A.C., Koteen, L E., Smithd, A.B., Watson, R., Harte, J., Norgaard, R.B. 2008. The debt of nations and the distribution of ecological impacts from human activities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105, 1773–1786.
Vallejo, M. C. 2010. Biophysical structure of the Ecuadorian economy, foreign trade and policy implications. Ecological Economics (accepted for publication).
Vallejo, M.C., Perez Rincon, M.A., Martinez-Alier, J. 2010. Metabolic Profile of the Colombian economy from 1970 to 2007. Journal of Industrial Ecology (accepted for publication).
Veuthey, S., Gerber, J.F. 2009. Logging conflicts in Southern Cameroon: a feminist ecological economics perspective, Ecological Economics (in press).
Walter, M., Martinez-Alier, J. 2010. How to Be Heard When Nobody Wants to Listen: the Esquel mining conflict, Canadian J. of Development Studies (in press).
Zografos, C., Howarth, R.B. (eds). 2008. Deliberative ecological economics, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 271 p.